Let the good discussion continue in the post below… but it’s Friday, so…
In honor of a couple of marathon meetings I attended this week:
1. What’s your view of meetings? Choose one or more, or make up your own:
a) When they’re good, they’re good. I love the feeling of people working well together on a common goal.
b) I don’t seek them out, but I recognize them as a necessary part of life.
c) The only good meeting is a canceled meeting.
I have been all three of these at various times, but I waver most frequently between a and b. In some of my ministries I have been moving “beyond meetings.” We need face time a few times a year, but for the most part, people have their marching orders and they do their thing. We communicate by e-mail and phone.
2. Do you like some amount of community building or conversation, or are you all business?
I do like community building, but the moderator of the meeting needs to have done his/her homework. If the meeting goes over time or is all over the place, people tend to blame the touchy-feely stuff rather than poor leadership. It can be done well. We do a 25 minute spiritual practice or book study at our session meetings that I lead, and I think it’s beneficial since we are also about spiritual leadership.
3. How do you feel about leading meetings? Share any particular strengths or weaknesses you have in this area.
I feel very comfortable doing this, though I won’t necessarily volunteer to lead in a setting in which the leader is not obvious. The introvert in me. And being a J on the Myers-Briggs can be a strength and a weakness. My meetings are efficient and never go over time. But at times people probably feel like I cut off discussion before it had fully run its course.
4. Have you ever participated in a virtual meeting? (conference call, IM, chat, etc.) What do you think of this format?
Yes. I actually prefer chat to conference calls, because I don’t like that thing where people talk at the same time, then everyone stops, then everyone starts talking again. Probably a good facilitator can help mitigate this. Chat is not an efficient way to run a meeting, but the benefit of not having to leave one’s easy chair (or even change out of pajamas) mitigates that.
5. Share a story of a memorable meeting you attended.
Our denomination’s General Assembly is an awesome experience peppered with moments of hair-pulling frustration. The first time I attended, whenever they started wordsmithing in the plenary assembly, I felt like I was being nibbled to death by ducks. I abhor writing in committee, and wordsmithing in a committee of 600 people is probably one of RM’s Circles of Hell.
Image from despair.com, a wicked and funny site.
4 Responses to “friday five: meetings meetings”
Leave a Reply
Search
Asides
» Best packaging. Did your headphones come in a sweet case? See a bottle of tea in another country that stood off the shelves? Well, that’s kind of a silly question, but I’ve come this far with the blog challenge… I did get this Gelaskin for my laptop. If you see me in the coffee place, say hi.
» When did you get your best rush of the year? Here.
» We didn’t really discover a new cuisine this year, but this resource has gotten us fed on many a busy night.


I wrote about pajamas, too! Great Friday Five, reverendmother!
Granted I haven’t read all the responses at RevGalBlogPals, but I’ve read enough to see that most people there feel they are basically good at facilitating meetings.
And it’s possible that that’s true. But we’ve all been in enough bad meetings that I wonder. Like Marie said in “When Harry Met Sally,” “Everyone thinks they have good taste and a sense of humor. But they can’t possibly ALL have good taste…”
“wordsmithing in a committee of 600″ is definitely one of the circles of hell. One of the lowest circles at that.
Deliver us, O Lord!
I’ve been to a meeting on the same order of magnitude (450 people) where wordsmithing was attempted and the image of being nibbled to death by ducks is so apt…
Quack!
And this would be one of the circles in hell, as would a meeting with no apparent leader - I might opt for the ducks in that case…